|This centre is a member of The LSE Research Laboratory [RLAB]: CASE | CEE | CEP | FMG | SERC | STICERD||Cookies?|
Paper No' CEPCP472: | Full paper
Save Reference as: BibTeX File | EndNote Import File
Keywords: Education; synthetic phonics; reading; education attainment; government policy
Is hard copy/paper copy available? YES - Paper Copy Still In Print.
This Paper is published under the following series: CentrePiece Magazine
Share this page: Google Bookmarks | Facebook | Twitter
Abstract:Children at risk of struggling with their reading get long-term benefits from ‘synthetic phonics’, the current favoured method among education policy-makers in England. The benefits for disadvantaged pupils justify the fixed cost of a year’s intensive training support to teachers. These are the conclusions of research by Sandra McNally and colleagues, which evaluates the effectiveness of synthetic phonics in improving children’s literacy. They find that teaching reading this way helps children from poorer backgrounds or those who do not have English as a first language. But on average, a government policy that requires all primary schools to use the method has had no measurable effect on pupils' reading scores at age 11.
CentrePiece 21 (1) Summer2016 pages: 14-15
This article summarises ‘“Teaching to Teach” Literacy’ by Stephen Machin, Sandra McNally and Martina Viarengo, CEP Discussion Paper No. 1425, April 2016.
Copyright © CEE & LSE 2003 - 2017 | LSE, Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE | Tel: +44(0)20 7955 7673 | Email: firstname.lastname@example.org | Site updated 11 December 2017